SF Peninsula Cities Sued by PG&E

Menlo Park, Redwood City & Woodside Sued by PG&E to Replace 80 Year Old Gas Line

In an attempt to replace three miles of an old gas line and hopefully prevent another catastrophic explosion like the one in San Bruno PG&E has filed three separate lawsuits against the cities of Menlo Park, Redwood City and Woodside so that they would be able to access real estate owned by both public entities and private owners. The line at issue, “Line #109,” was installed in the 1930’s and has been ordered replaced by the California Public Utilities Commission.

business industrial worker
Because significant real estate development has occurred over sections of the old pipe line over the last eighty plus years the State of California statutorily has granted PG&E the right to exercise the power of eminent domain. PG&E states in its lawsuit that it has made fair-market value offers to the property owners but has received limited response and must proceed with expediency.
The locations of the proposed replacement are sections of real estate near Interstate I-280 north of Sand Hill Road, near Woodside Road to Farm Hill Boulevard, and near Eden Bower Lane to Wilmington Way. Sections of Sharon Heights Golf and Country Club are also affected by the easement PG&E is requesting.
The proposed replacement pipeline is a 24” high quality steel gas line with automated valves that can be operated remotely. This hi-tech gas line will also be equipped with internal monitoring and inspection tools/gauges.

Assuming PG&E is successful in their lawsuits seeking easements to install the new gas line the existing property owners will be able to use and access their property, but will not be allowed to construct and structures, plant trees, or do anything that would disrupt the operation of the gas line.

 

Feature image courtesy of www.portolaplanet.com

Shelly Roberson

Related

Is Spring the Best Time to Buy a Palo Alto Home?

Real Estate Agents Need Social Media or They Will Die?

Health Care Retirement Costs For Couples Top $220,000 – Imagine A Real Estate Strategy To Help Pay For That

Palo Alto’s Comprehensive Plan Delays Prompt Zoning Changes – The Value Of Your Real Estate At Stake

Unbelievable Price for a Palo Alto Tear Down House!

Do You Remember The Best Nine (9) Real Estate Movies Of All Time?

Attention Downsizing Baby Boomers – Sell Your House, Protect All Your Equity, and Pay NO Capital Gains Taxes with this Simple Strategy Using Tools Congress Gave Us

Mountain View Weighs Increased Developer Fees – What Else?

How To Avoid The Big Housing Crunch Awaiting Many Baby Boomers

New California Real Estate Laws for 2015

things to think about when buying a home

Buying a Home?

Your Investment Properties And Your Personal Assets Are Exposed To Litigation If You Haven’t Properly Protected Them

Most Common Real Estate Tax Audit Issues In 2014 And How To Avoid Them

The High Price To The Low Bid – Why You Should Never Hire An Unlicensed Contractor To Work On Your Property (When A License Is Required)

California Avenue May Become Palo Alto’s New Business and Trendy Hub

Why Real Estate Investors Continue To Make The Same Mistakes Over & Over Again?

Palo Alto Inventory Inching Upwards Week Ending February 23

Shelly Roberson Realtor

Choosing the Right Realtor® for You

Baby Boomers Property Tax Relief

Baby Boomers, Property Tax Relief, and Downsizing Strategies

Cost Value Ratio 2015 – What Are The Best Improvements Sellers Can Make To Improve Return-On-Investment?

Leave a Comment





For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.